—
Julian Assange, in a phone conversation with the editor of UK magazine Private Eye.
Now, in fairness, I don’t know anything about Private Eye, including whether it’s remotely credible. The name of the magazine certainly sounds tabloidy. I guess I could do “research” on this, but no.
So, assuming that this phone call is being faithfully reported, why are folks highlighting the antisemitism in the phone call (Assange proposed and then abandoned the theory that several Jewish Guardian journalists were conspiring to malign him) while ignoring gems like the above? I’ll confess that I’m happy to see Assange flirting with public antisemitism, because that is the kind of shit that gets people upset with you. Not like, you know, being sexist. Loudly. While you are a defendant in a rape case.
Maybe the idea is that the antisemitism is something new. Is that the idea? That we are all on the same page about him being a terrible misogynist? Maybe we are. Are we? Somebody tell me if everyone agrees that Julian Assange is a terrible misogynist. Because if we don’t all agree about that yet, I’d like to keep hammering at that point.